Defendants be provided with a free attorney.

Defendants be provided with a free attorney.

Is it enough that
defendants be provided with a free attorney if they cannot afford one, or do they have a right to expect the same quality of legal representation that persons who can afford the best attorneys receive? Should taxpayers pay the defendant’s costs for tools such as DNA testing, psychological or psychiatric evaluation, or expert witnesses? Explain your position. 300 words with references

%d bloggers like this: