Does the concept of judicial interpretation of the law mean that judges can make whatever law they wish? And how can courts remain flexible, if they are required to follow precedent? Please explain in detail.

Does the concept of judicial interpretation of the law mean that judges can make whatever law they wish? And how can courts remain flexible, if they are required to follow precedent? Please explain in detail.

  

paragraph – must contain substantive content and cite any references.

Question:  Does the concept of judicial interpretation of the law mean that judges can make whatever law they wish?  And how can courts remain flexible, if they are required to follow precedent?  Please explain in detail. 

  
%d bloggers like this: